Risk factors related to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine additional doses hesitancy among pregnant and non-pregnant people of reproductive age and partners: A Brazilian cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the predictors of acceptance and hesitancy of additional doses of any SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccine among pregnant or recently pregnant and non-pregnant people of reproductive age and partners in Brazil. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional study from June 2022 to April 2023 and invited women and partners between 18 and 49 years old to participate. We employed a snowball strategy to reach all potential eligible participants. Our primary outcome was the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. We estimated the frequency and percentage for the three groups and compared categorical variables using the Chi-square test. Moreover, bivariate, backward stepwise regression, and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. We reported the effect size as OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS: We included 1487 participants, and among them, 334 (22.5%) were pregnant or recently pregnant people, 905 (60.8%) were non-pregnant people, and 247 (16.6%) were male partners. Pregnant and recently pregnant people showed greater hesitancy for the COVID-19 vaccine booster than non-pregnant people (28% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and male partners (28% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Non-pregnant women accepted the COVID-19 vaccine more often than pregnant or recently pregnant people (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.13-2.70). The associated factors to the reduced COVID-19 vaccine booster acceptance were family income between US$ 566-945.00 (54%), evangelic religion (65%), concern about vaccine safety (80%) and perceived common vaccine importance (93%). CONCLUSION: Pregnant people were more hesitant than non-pregnant people to accept the COVID-19 booster vaccine. Family income, religious beliefs, vaccine safety concerns, and perceived common vaccine importance were significant barriers to accepting COVID-19 booster vaccines. The impact of these factors was more evident among pregnant or recently pregnant people, emphasizing the harmful effect of misinformation among this vulnerable population.

Barriers to accessing post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil: The impact of COVID-19.

The aim of our article is to discuss barriers associated with post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Socioeconomic differences in gaining access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods became greater during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inadequate distribution of existing resources and the reduced capacity for elective care meant that healthcare providers in family planning had to be reallocated to respond to COVID-19 emergencies. In Brazil, 74% of the population depends on the national health service (Sistema Unico de Saúde) including for the provision of free contraception. However, the only LARC method available at the public service is the copper-intrauterine device (IUD); implants and hormonal-IUDs are not available, except at some teaching hospitals. Contraceptive sales remained unmodified during the pandemic, which shows that the majority of the population used less effective or no contraceptive methods during this time. However, sales of implants and the hormonal-IUD increased significantly, indicating the inequity of the low-income portion of the society as only the wealthy can afford these. On the other hand, there was an increase in sales of emergency contraception. The uptake of postpartum IUDs and contraceptive implants at the selected teaching hospitals in which they were available was high during the COVID-19 pandemic as they were the only methods immediately available. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic increased both inequality and social differences in gaining access to contraceptives. Postpartum and immediate post abortion methods were also good strategies during the pandemic and were well accepted by the population. However, they were not offered by most services.

Effectiveness and continuation rates of the etonogestrel-subdermal contraceptive implant versus short-acting contraceptive methods offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, reasons for discontinuation and continuation rates of the etonogestrel (ENG)-subdermal contraceptive implant when offered at no cost, and the basis of free choice versus short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods including combined oral contraceptives (COCs), once-a-month injectables, vaginal ring, and patch. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas, Brazil, involving women aged 18 to 40 years. They were counseled on various contraceptive methods before entering the study and followed up every 3 months for up to 24 months. Satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier test, and curve comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We enrolled 609 women including 358/609 women (58.8%) who chose the ENG-implant and 251/609 (41.2%) who chose SARC methods. Contraceptive failure and all other reasons for discontinuation were significantly higher in SARC users compared to the ENG-implant users (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The continuation rate was higher among ENG-implant users (89.9% and 75.4%) compared to SARC methods users (27.2% and 15.9%) up to 1 and 2 years after study initiation, respectively. Satisfaction was high in both groups (>82%). CONCLUSIONS: The ENG-implant showed higher contraceptive effectiveness and higher continuation rates than SARC methods up to 2 years after study initiation. Furthermore, users from both groups were highly satisfied with their contraceptive. The main reason for discontinuing use of the ENG-implant was bothersome uterine bleeding, while for SARC methods it was for personal reasons.

Gene expression associated with vaginal bleeding in women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel hormonal intrauterine device: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gene expression associated with vaginal bleeding in the 52-mg hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving 100 women seeking to use the 52-mg hormonal IUD for contraception. We excluded women with a history or current condition of abnormal uterine bleeding and who were unable to attend a 1-year follow up. Women who expelled the device, removed it for reasons unrelated to vaginal bleeding, or were lost to follow up were discontinued. We collected endometrial biopsies immediately before IUD placement and assessed 20 selected genes using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Users maintained a uterine bleeding diary for 12 months following IUD insertion. For statistical analysis, participants were categorized into groups with or without vaginal bleeding at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Women with elevated CXCL9 expression had an 8.15-fold higher likelihood of experiencing vaginal bleeding at 3 months (odds ratio [OR] 8.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-29.61, P = 0.001). At 12 months of follow up, women with increased TIMP1 expression had a 2.74-fold higher chance of experiencing vaginal bleeding (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.08-6.95, P = 0.033). CXCL9 ≥ 1.5 and IL17A ≥ 0.68 were associated with a higher probability of vaginal bleeding at 3 months, while TIMP1 levels ≥0.943 were linked to an increased risk of bleeding at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Users of the 52-mg hormonal IUD with elevated relative CXCL9 expression face an increased risk of vaginal bleeding at 3-month follow up, whereas those with heightened TIMP1 expression are more likely to experience vaginal bleeding at 12 months.

Uptake, discontinuation, and continuation rate of long-acting contraceptive methods when offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the uptake, reasons for discontinuation, continuation, and satisfaction of long-acting contraceptive methods (LARC) when offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, including women aged 18 to 48 years, who adopted one of three methods. Participants underwent telephone follow-up every 3 months for up to 24 months after insertion. Satisfaction was assessed at the end of 2 years of use through the Likert scale. RESULTS: We invited 1222 women, and among the 971 women who volunteered to participate in follow-up, 414 (42.6%) chose the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device (IUD), 358 (36.9%) chose the etonogestrel (ENG) implant, and 199 (20.5%) chose the TCu380A IUD. Discontinuation due to bothersome bleeding was higher among users of the ENG implant (10/358; 2.4%) and the TCu380A IUD (32/199; 8.9%), and expulsion was higher for the TCu380A IUD (30/199; 15.1%). Women continued at 24 months were 340/414 (82.1%), 270/358 (75.4%), and 119/199 (59.8%) among users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD, ENG implant, and TCu380A IUD, respectively. The users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (301/339, 88.8%), the ENG-implant (222/270, 82.2%), and the TCu380A IUD (105/119, 88.2%) were satisfied or very satisfied by 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The three LARC methods had great uptake, high continuation, and discontinuation due to bothersome bleeding was higher among users of the ENG implant and the TCu380A IUD, and expulsion was higher for the TCu380A IUD compared to the 52-mg levonorgestrel IUD. Most of the participants reported being very satisfied. IMPLICATIONS: When the LARC methods were offered at no cost in a Brazilian public clinic the uptake, satisfaction and continuation were high by 24 months after device placement, and high level of satisfaction was reported by most of the participants.

Association between COVID-19 and vaccination on menstrual cycle.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in the menstrual pattern of women of reproductive age infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A cross-sectional study at the University of Campinas, Brazil using Google questionnaire applied from December 2021 through February 2022, disseminated through snowball technique. Participants responded about characteristics of their menstrual cycle before the pandemic and before COVID-19 vaccination, and then about characteristics of their cycle 3 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and 3 months after vaccination. Our primary outcome was a binary indicator of changes in the menstrual cycle. We used multivariate regression analysis to identify factors associated with menstrual changes. RESULTS: We received 1012 completed questionnaires and 735 (72.7%) were from women aged between 20 and 39 years, 745 (73.6%) were White and 491 (48.6%) lived with a partner. A total of 419 (41.6%) of the women reported SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, only two of them were hospitalized, and 995 (98.8%) of women had at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. About menstrual characteristics, 170 (41.3%) reported changes after having COVID-19 and 294 (29.9%) after COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. Few years of schooling, lower income, and non-white ethnicity were related to higher reports of menstrual changes after COVID-19. Menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination were associated with not using contraception. Higher body mass index was associated with irregularities in cyclicity and bleeding days, after COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results corroborated the stability of the menstrual cycle after having COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccination; however, there is a potential relationship between menstrual changes and socioeconomic factors as well as contraceptive use.

Menstrual health: Inequities in a cohort of menstruating people in the Brazilian southeastern region.

OBJECTIVE: To assess menstrual hygiene management (MHM) and period poverty in a group of low- and medium-income menstruating people. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Campinas, Brazil, from January to June 2022 with 535 participants aged 18-49. For data collection, we used the abbreviated version of the WHO Quality-of-Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and a pre-tested questionnaire with items regarding MHM and period poverty. RESULTS: We found an inverse relationship between the risk of no access to supplies to perform menstrual hygiene, which increased by 2.5% and each point less in the environmental domain of quality of life (QoL), and this risk increased by up to 3.1 times among participants who reported difficulty making ends meet. The risk of not having adequate conditions to perform menstrual hygiene at home increased by up to 2.6% for every one-point drop in the environmental domain of QoL. The risk of not having adequate conditions to perform menstrual hygiene outside the home increased by up to 1.3% for less points in the psychological domain of QoL, and 44.4% of those who indicated inadequate conditions for menstrual hygiene reported two or more childbirths. CONCLUSIONS: Menstruating people who have an increased risk of lacking menstrual supplies and have an increased risk of inadequate conditions for MHM at home and outside the home, as well as those who have two or more deliveries and those having difficulties making ends meet, scored low on the QoL, especially in the environmental and psychological dimensions.

Clinical Assessment of 3 Intrauterine Devices in Adolescent Girls: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical performance, bleeding pattern, dysmenorrhea, and satisfaction up to 1 year after placement of 3 types of intrauterine devices (IUDs) (TCu380A, levonorgestrel 52 mg, and levonorgestrel 19.5 mg) in adolescents METHODS: The study was a randomized trial with 318 adolescents allocated to the 3 IUDs. We assessed reasons for removal, continuation, menstrual patterns, dysmenorrhea, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants aged (mean ± SD) 17.9 ± 1.4 years, with 80.8% being nulligravidae. After 1 year, 265 (83.3%) continued using the IUD; however, the continuation rate of TCu380A (75.4 ± 4.2) was lower than that of both the levonorgestrel 52-mg (88.6 ± 3.1) and 19.5-mg IUDs (86.8 ± 3.3), and bleeding/pain and expulsion were the main reasons for removal of the TCu380A IUD. The duration of menstruation was longer among the TCu380A IUD users (6.0 ± 2.0 days) than those using the levonorgestrel 52 mg (2.5 ± 3.9) and 19.5 mg (3.2 ± 3.2) devices, P < .001. Amenorrhea was reported by 49.5% and 37.8% users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg and 19.5-mg devices, respectively, P < .001. Dysmenorrhea was reported in 68.5% of all participants at the baseline; this was 67.9% of the TCu380A group and 33.3% and 36.0% of the levonorgestrel 52-mg and 19.5-mg IUD groups, respectively, P < .001. Satisfaction ranged from 80.7% in the TCu380A group to 97.8% in the levonorgestrel 52-mg group (P = .03). CONCLUSION: The 3 IUDs are suitable for adolescents, with high contraceptive efficacies and rates of continuation within 1 year of use and high degrees of satisfaction. Users of the hormonal IUDs reported lower expulsion rates, more favorable menstrual patterns, and less dysmenorrhea compared with the TCu380A IUD.

Preterm births prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: results from the national database.

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the health systems between and within countries, and in the course of the pandemic sexual and reproductive health services were the most disrupted. Findings from high-income settings have reported significant changes in preterm birth prevalence during the pandemic period. To understand the possible effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on preterm birth numbers at the Brazilian national level. We compare the number of preterm deliveries during the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020 and 2021) with previous years. We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study taking the period from January 2017 to December 2021 to account. We use individual-level live births data from the Brazilian Live Birth Information System (SINASC), and we estimate the odds ratio (OR) of preterm deliveries using propensity score weighting analysis in Brazil and its regions. During the study period (from 2017 to 2021), about 2.7 million live births were recorded per year, and the missing value for gestational age at delivery was less than 1.5%. The preterm birth prevalence slightly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (11.32% in 2021 vs 11.09% in 2019, p-value < 0.0001). After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, the OR of preterm births in Brazil has significantly increased, 4% in 2020 (OR: 1.04 [1.03-1.05] 95% CI, p-value < 0.001), and 2% in 2021(OR: 1.02 [1.01-1.03] 95% CI, p-value < 0.001), compared to 2019. At the regional level, the preterm birth pattern in the South, Southeast and Northeast regions show a similar pattern. The highest odds ratio was observed in the South region (2020 vs 2019, OR: 1.07 [1.05-1.10] 95% CI; 2021 vs 2019, OR: 1.03 [1.01-1.06] 95% CI). However, we also observed a significant reduction in the ORs of preterm births in the northern region during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 vs 2019, OR: 0.96 [0.94-0.98] 95% CI) and (2021 vs 2019, OR: 0.97 [0.95-0.99] 95% CI). Our analysis shows that the pandemic has increased regional variation in the number of preterm births in Brazil in 2020 and 2021 compared to the pre-pandemic years.

Provision of contraceptives by Brazilian general gynaecologists: a nationwide online survey.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the provision of contraceptives by Brazilian obstetricians and gynaecologists (Obst/Gyns) during medical consultation and associated factors. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted with Obst/Gyns regarding age, gender, training, method counselling about and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). RESULTS: Of 16,000 Obst/Gyns, 610 (3.8%) answered the survey. After multiple regression analysis, female Obst/Gyns (reference) (OR male was 0.53 [95%CI 0.28-0.98], p = 0.044) and Obst/Gyns aged between 20 and 39 were more likely to provide an IUD. For hormonal-IUDs, Obst/Gyns who had had theoretical training in hormonal-IUD insertion (reference no training) (OR = 2.13 [95%CI 1.14-3.99], p = 0.018), those who work in a private facility or public hospital, and those that allowed more time during consultations (reference) (OR short time = 0.33 [95%CI 0.17-0.63], p < 0.001) were more likely to provide them. Obst/Gyns who were hands-on trained were more likely to provide subdermal implant (OR = 2.04 [95%CI 1.45-2.87], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between theoretical and practical training received by this cohort of Obst/Gyns regarding LARCs, mainly contraceptive implants and hormonal-IUDs. The identification of barriers to offering contraceptives is essential to providing client-centred contraceptive care.

There is a gap between the theoretical and practical training received by Brazil-based Obst/Gyns regarding LARC methods, mainly subdermal implants and hormonal-IUDs. The identification of barriers is essential to providing client-centred contraceptive care.

Expulsion and continuation rates of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system in adolescents and adult women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the continuation rates, expulsion, and other reasons for discontinuation of the hormonal intrauterine device with 52 mg of levonorgestrel (52 mg LNG-IUD) in adolescents and adult women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included 393 women in whom we placed a 52 mg LNG-IUD and followed up to 5 years. We created two retrospective cohorts, one with 131 adolescents (aged between 12 and 19 years) and the other with 262 women aged ≥20 years. Each adolescent was paired with two adult women who had the same parity and who had a 52 mg LNG-IUD inserted on the same day. We used the Mann-Whitney test to compare numerical variables in both groups, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test to compare the continuation, expulsion and other reasons for IUD discontinuation of the two groups. RESULTS: Age of the adolescents and adult women were mean ± SD 18.1 (±1.1) and 31 (±6.8) years, respectively (p = 0.015). Continuation rates by the fifth year of use were 55.6/100 women-years (W-Y) and 70.3/100 W-Y among adolescents and adult women (p = 0.106); and expulsion rates were 8.4/100 and 6.0/100 W-Y, respectively (p = 0.463). Adolescents had a lower continuation rate during 3 to 5 years of follow-up (p = 0.011) and a high rate of removals due to bleeding/pain (18.5 ± 5.7/100 W-Y vs 6.4/100 ± 2.1 W-Y, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Adolescents who used the 52 mg LNG-IUD showed a lower continuation rate 3-5 years after device placement than adult women. The expulsion rates were similar in both groups.

Adolescents who used the 52 mg LNG-IUD showed expulsion rates similar than adult women. Despite the good continuation rate, adolescents had a lower continuation rate within 3­5 years of follow-up and high rate of removals due to bleeding/pain than adult users.

Women's perspectives on impact on the post menopause of use of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine device during the menopausal transition.

OBJECTIVES: To assess perimenopausal users of 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) regarding the IUD impact after menopause. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a cross-sectional study with users aged 40 and 49 years old, without cognitive impairment that answered a questionnaire regarding worries and benefits after the menopause due to LNG-IUD use. RESULTS: Almost half of 221 users (52.9%) have concerns that LNG-IUD use could influence aspects after menopause, 111 (50.3%) that the post-menopause symptoms get worse and 92 (41.6%) that interfere with recognition of menopausal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Half of perimenopausal LNG-IUD users expressed concerns about how device use could affect post-menopause symptoms.

The 52 mg hormonal-IUD who were at menopausal transition reported worries that the use of the IUD can affect menopausal symptoms. It is important that health professionals can routinely guide these women.

Standardising outcome reporting for clinical trials of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: Development of a core outcome set.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a core outcome set for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). DESIGN: Core outcome set (COS) development methodology described by the COMET initiative. SETTING: University hospital gynaecology department, online international survey and web-based international consensus meetings. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: An international collaboration of stakeholders (clinicians, patients, academics, guideline developers) from 20 countries and 6 continents. METHODS: Phase 1: Systematic review of previously reported outcomes to identify potential core outcomes. Phase 2: Qualitative studies with patients to identify outcomes most important to them. Phase 3: Online two-round Delphi survey to achieve consensus about which outcomes are most important. Phase 4: A consensus meeting to finalise the COS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome importance was assessed in the Delphi survey on a 9-point scale. RESULTS: From the 'long list' of 114, 10 outcomes were included in the final COS: subjective blood loss; flooding; menstrual cycle metrics; severity of dysmenorrhoea; number of days with dysmenorrhoea; quality of life; adverse events; patient satisfaction; number of patients going on to have further treatment for HMB and haemoglobin level. CONCLUSIONS: The final COS includes variables that are feasible for use in clinical trials in all resource settings and apply to all known underlying causes of the symptom of HMB. These outcomes should be reported in all future trials of interventions, their systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines to underpin policy.

Analysing the context and characteristics of legal abortion and comprehensive post-abortion care among adolescents aged 10-14 in a network of sentinel centres in Latin America: a retrospective cross-sectional study, 2016-2020.

Pregnancy-related complications are a substantial source of morbidity and mortality among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries. While the youngest adolescents (those aged 10-14) are considered to be at particularly high risk of adverse outcomes, there is little empirical data available on their sexual and reproductive health. Using a unique dataset of clinical records drawn from a regional network of sentinel centres providing legal abortion and comprehensive post-abortion care in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries, we described the population of adolescents aged 10-14 seeking legal abortion and post-abortion care and calculated institutional rates of complications, using older adolescents (aged 15-19) and young adults (aged 20-24) as comparator groups. We also assessed the quality of care provided as compared to WHO recommendations. Nearly 17% (89 out of 533) of young adolescents sought care when they were already at 15 or more weeks' gestation. Young adolescents were at higher risk of pre-procedure and intra-operative complications than older adolescents and young adults, though the trend is less clear for the most severe complications. In general, the quality of care provided by centres in the network was aligned with WHO recommendations for safe abortion and comprehensive post-abortion care. Taken together, these findings provide insight into the challenges facing the global health community in assuring the sexual and reproductive health and rights of the youngest adolescents, and outline avenues for future research, advocacy, and evidence-based policymaking.

Assessment of pain and ease of intrauterine device placement according to type of device, parity, and mode of delivery.

OBJECTIVE: We compared pain and the ease of insertion of two different types of intrauterine devices (IUDs; the levonorgestrel intrauterine systems 52 mg (LNG-IUS 52 mg) and the copper-bearing IUD [TCu380A]) among nulligravidas and parous women with and without caesarean delivery. METHODS: A cross-sectional study assessed pain referred by women and ease of insertion of the two IUDs models. We applied a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain, while the ease of insertion was defined by healthcare professionals. RESULTS: We assessed 1076 women, including 334 nulligravidas and 566 parous women who had had at least one caesarean delivery and 176 women with history of only vaginal delivery. Regarding pain at IUD placement, 26 (2.5%) women reported no pain, 167 (16.4%) light pain, 319 (31.3%) moderate and 506 (49.7%) intense pain. The highest scores for pain were reported by nulligravidas (67.2%, p = 0.001), while the mean pain score was higher in the LNG-IUS 52 mg group. Difficulties reported by healthcare providers were more frequent in the nulligravidas (21.2%) and women with previous caesarean delivery (16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested differences between the two IUDs tested, with higher pain associated with the LNG-IUS 52 mg, and highlights the need for pain management, mainly among nulligravida and women with history of caesarean delivery.SHORT CONDENSATIONIntense pain at insertion was more related to nulligravida than parous women and more pain with placement of LNG-IUS 52 mg IUDs than TCu380A IUDs. Nevertheless, our results confirmed that ease of IUD placement was between 80% to 90% of all insertions, being more common in parous women without previous caesarean delivery.

Fortalecimiento de la investigación local para abordar la salud y los derechos sexuales y reproductivos de las personas migrantes de Venezuela y América Central

[EXTRACTO] La evidencia que surge de este número especial destaca las necesidades específicas de las personas migrantes latinoamericanas respecto a la respuesta de los sistemas de salud a la salud sexual y reproductiva y las enfermedades infecciosas. Si bien hay políticas relacionadas con la salud de las personas migrantes y refugiadas, y se observan esfuerzos para fortalecer los sistemas de salud en los países de acogida, las personas migrantes de América Latina aún enfrentan una gran cantidad de dificultades al recurrir a los sistemas de salud para atender sus necesidades de SDSR. La pandemia de COVID-19 exacerbó aún más estos desafíos. Se necesitan políticas de SDSR que puedan llevarse a la práctica para poder responder adecuadamente a las necesidades de las personas migrantes.

Strengthening locally led research to respond to the sexual and reproductive health and rights of migrants from Venezuela and Central America

[EXTRACT] The evidence emerging from this special issue highlights the specific needs of Latin American migrants with regards to health system response to sexual and reproductive health and infectious diseases. While policies relating to the health of ref- ugees and migrants and efforts to strengthen health systems in host countries exist, migrants in Latin America still face a myr- iad of challenges when navigating health systems in addressing their SRHR needs. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacer- bated these challenges. Specific SRHR actionable policies are needed to ensure the needs of migrants are fully met.

Acceptance rate of post-placental plac ement of intrauterine devices during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptance rate of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUD) placement during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic and to to assess factors associated with PPIUD acceptance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2020 and August 2021. PPIUDs were offered to women scheduled for caesarean delivery or admitted in labour at the Women's Hospital of the University of Campinas. The study compared women according to whether they accepted or did not accept the IUD placement. The factors associated with PPIUD acceptance were analysed through bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We enrolled 299 women (15.9% of the deliveries that occurred during study period), aged 26.8 ± 6.5 years; 41.8% were White, almost one third were primiparous, and 155/299 (51.8%) had a vaginal delivery. The PPIUD acceptance rate was 65.6%. The principal reason for refusal was the desire for another contraceptive (41.8%). Women with the highest likelihood of accepting a PPIUD were younger (<30 years old has 1.7 more likely or 74% greater), those without a partner (3.4 times more likely) and those after vaginal delivery (1.7 times more likely or 69% greater). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 does not affected the PPIUD placement. PPIUD is a viable alternative during crisis in which women has difficult to access health services. Younger women, those without a partner and after vaginal delivery were more likely to accept a PPIUD during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Post-placental IUDs are an alternative during periods of crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. Younger women, those without a partner and after vaginal delivery were more likely to accept a PPIUD during the COVID-19 pandemic.